1875, Sept. 17 -Sarah (Smith) Peacockborn Co. Antrim, Ireland
female, age 65
Tumour – 7 years; no physician in attendance
Informant - Thomas Peacock, farmer,
Presbyterian
Registered October 16, 1875
Registrar: James Boyer
1879, March 8 –Hugh Peacock
born Ireland
male, age 22
Consumption; Dr. Bridgeland
Informant - Thomas Peacock, Macaulay
Registered March 20, 1879
Registrar: David Dickson
1895, March 3 - Thomas Peacockborn Ireland
male, age 76, farmer, Macaulay
General ?? Decay; Dr. Topp, Bracebridge
Informant -
Registered March 4, 1895
Registrar: William Gohm
Methodist (sic)
1897, Nov. 23 –Catherine (Peacock) Brown
born Ireland
female, age 54 1/2, housewife
English church
Lot 15, Concession A
heart disease, 4 months; Dr. Williams
Registered Nov 23/1897
1899, Dec. 8 - Robert Peacockborn Ireland
male, age 39, hotel keeper,
Scotia (Junction?), Parry Sound
pneumonia, 6 days; Dr. Barber
Church of England
1914, March 15 –John Peacockborn Co. Antrim, Ireland
male, -age 60, married
parents – Thomas Peacock & Sarah Smith
Cause: cancer, Carcinoma, 6 months
Immediate cause – heart failure
Dr. W. D. McHanoyle (?)
Registered by George Nelson Peacock
16 March, 1914
1918, November 25 - Frederick Peacock
male, 43 years old, b. Macaulay Twp
died Huntsville, Chaffey Twp
Married, occupation - clerk
son of John Peacock/Mary Oliver
Cause of death - asphyxia of influenza/pneumonia
sick two days - Dr. E.G. Evans
Informant - Mrs. M. Peacock
1921, April 13 - Frederick Peacock
born Ireland
male, age 71, married, labourer
of Falkenburg
Orillia Hospital
Father – Thomas Peacock , b. Ireland
Informant:Joseph O. Peacock, nephew
230 Harris Street, Orillia
Found drowned in Orillia,
No attendance by physician: accidental
Dr. John McLean, Coroner, Orillia Hosp.
Buried April 15, 1921
Undertaker: D. Clarke, Orillia
Showing posts with label Peacock Records Ontario. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peacock Records Ontario. Show all posts
Friday, October 17, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Some Peacock Marriages
David TAIT, 20, farmer, Pennsylvania USA, Monck Tp.,
s/o William L. & Mary, married Anne WAINRIGHT, 18,
County Cavan Ireland, Bracebridge, d/o Samuel & Mary
Ann, witn: John PEACOCK of Macaulay & Elizabeth
WAINRIGHT of Bracebridge on Jan. 1, 1874 at the home
of William L. Tait at Monck Tp.
5942-75 James JONES, 25, yeoman, Ireland, Macaulay twp.,
s/o Charles & Isabella, married Fanny MOORE, 19, England,
Macaulay twp., d/o Mathias & Susan, witn: John PEACOCK
of Macaulay & Mary OLIVER of Stephenson,
6 April 1875 at Bracebridge
5944-75 John PEACOCK, 21, farmer, Co. **Derry, Ireland,
Macaulay, s/o Thomas & Sarah, married Mary OLIVER, 17,
Canada, Stephenson, d/o Joseph & Ellen, witn: Hugh
PEACOCK & Annie KIRBY, both of Macaulay,
17 May 1875 at Bracebridge
6934-78 - Hugh PEACOCK, 21, farmer, Ireland, Monck,
s/o Thomas & Sarah, married Margaret NEVINS, 17,
Harriston, Monck, d/o Thomas Coynes NEVINS & Annabella
HARTY, witn: William NEVINS of Monck, 2 Oct 1878 at Monck
Robert PEACOCK, 20, Twp, Monck, b. Canada (?), bachelor,
Farmer, son of Thomas & Catherine (?) Peacock, married
Mary MOFFATT, 18, Twp Macaulay, b. Canada, spinster, d/o
William & Eliza Ann Moffatt, Witnesses: G. H. Vanattan,
Orillia - L.J. Moffatt, Macaulay, by Rev. H.J. Matthews,
by licence, Methodist, 3 Jan. 1884
008107-93 Joseph OLIVER, 24, farmer, England, Stephenson Tp.,
s/o Joseph & Ellen, married Emma SPENCER, 22, Macaulay Tp.,
same, d/o Abel & Sarah Ann, witn: Albert & Ada PATTERSON both
of Stephenson Tp. on June 7, 1893 at Bracebridge
12124-02 Henry BYFORD, 24, laborer, England, Bracebridge,
s/o Joseph & Ellen, married Mary PEACOCK, 17, Ontario,
Macauley, d/o John PEACOCK & Mary E. OLIVER, witn:
Caroline & Frederick PEACOCK of Scotia Junction,
2 April 1902 at Falkenburg
13108-04 (Muskoka Dist.) Thomas PEACOCK, 22, farmer,
Macauley twp., s/o John PEACOCK & Mary OLIVER,
married Clara Emma FORSYTH, 21, Macauley twp., same,
d/o John FORSYTH & Mary DALES, witn: William PEACOCK
& Jessie FORSYTH, both of Macauley twp., 1 June 1904
at Macauley
13111-04 John OLIVER, 30, carpenter, Stephenson twp.,
Macauley, s/o Joseph OLIVER & Ellen **BUKER, married Maud
Alice GOHEN, 29, Macauley, same, d/o William GOHEN &
Adeline PRATT, witn: Henry GOHEN & Laura KIRK, both of
Macauley, 7 Dec 1904 at Macauley (GOHM?)
** The original record needs to be checked as Mary Ellen Peacock's 1935
death record gives Ellen's maiden name as Tubb(s).
013535-05 (Muskoka) George Nelson PEACOCK, 20,
laborer, Macauley Twp, same s/o John PEACOCK and
Mary Ellen OLIVER married Jesse FORSYTH, 20,
Macauley Twp, same d/o John FORSYTH and Mary
DALES, witness – George FORSYTH and Violet S.
PEACOCK, August 9, 1905, Bracebridge
18101-1919 Harvey Ray PEACOCK, 21, Labour, Scotia Jct.,
Bracebridge, s/o Robert Ray PEACOCK & Mary MOFFET,
married Robina CARSON, 20, Cache Bay, Same, d/o Thomas
CARSON & Agnes FLOOD, Wtn. George BOUTETTE, Loretta
McNALLY, on Dec. 24, 1919 at Sturgeon Falls
**Please note that other Peacock records, including John's
death certificate state that the family came from County Antrim,
not Derry.
s/o William L. & Mary, married Anne WAINRIGHT, 18,
County Cavan Ireland, Bracebridge, d/o Samuel & Mary
Ann, witn: John PEACOCK of Macaulay & Elizabeth
WAINRIGHT of Bracebridge on Jan. 1, 1874 at the home
of William L. Tait at Monck Tp.
5942-75 James JONES, 25, yeoman, Ireland, Macaulay twp.,
s/o Charles & Isabella, married Fanny MOORE, 19, England,
Macaulay twp., d/o Mathias & Susan, witn: John PEACOCK
of Macaulay & Mary OLIVER of Stephenson,
6 April 1875 at Bracebridge
5944-75 John PEACOCK, 21, farmer, Co. **Derry, Ireland,
Macaulay, s/o Thomas & Sarah, married Mary OLIVER, 17,
Canada, Stephenson, d/o Joseph & Ellen, witn: Hugh
PEACOCK & Annie KIRBY, both of Macaulay,
17 May 1875 at Bracebridge
6934-78 - Hugh PEACOCK, 21, farmer, Ireland, Monck,
s/o Thomas & Sarah, married Margaret NEVINS, 17,
Harriston, Monck, d/o Thomas Coynes NEVINS & Annabella
HARTY, witn: William NEVINS of Monck, 2 Oct 1878 at Monck
Robert PEACOCK, 20, Twp, Monck, b. Canada (?), bachelor,
Farmer, son of Thomas & Catherine (?) Peacock, married
Mary MOFFATT, 18, Twp Macaulay, b. Canada, spinster, d/o
William & Eliza Ann Moffatt, Witnesses: G. H. Vanattan,
Orillia - L.J. Moffatt, Macaulay, by Rev. H.J. Matthews,
by licence, Methodist, 3 Jan. 1884
008107-93 Joseph OLIVER, 24, farmer, England, Stephenson Tp.,
s/o Joseph & Ellen, married Emma SPENCER, 22, Macaulay Tp.,
same, d/o Abel & Sarah Ann, witn: Albert & Ada PATTERSON both
of Stephenson Tp. on June 7, 1893 at Bracebridge
12124-02 Henry BYFORD, 24, laborer, England, Bracebridge,
s/o Joseph & Ellen, married Mary PEACOCK, 17, Ontario,
Macauley, d/o John PEACOCK & Mary E. OLIVER, witn:
Caroline & Frederick PEACOCK of Scotia Junction,
2 April 1902 at Falkenburg
13108-04 (Muskoka Dist.) Thomas PEACOCK, 22, farmer,
Macauley twp., s/o John PEACOCK & Mary OLIVER,
married Clara Emma FORSYTH, 21, Macauley twp., same,
d/o John FORSYTH & Mary DALES, witn: William PEACOCK
& Jessie FORSYTH, both of Macauley twp., 1 June 1904
at Macauley
13111-04 John OLIVER, 30, carpenter, Stephenson twp.,
Macauley, s/o Joseph OLIVER & Ellen **BUKER, married Maud
Alice GOHEN, 29, Macauley, same, d/o William GOHEN &
Adeline PRATT, witn: Henry GOHEN & Laura KIRK, both of
Macauley, 7 Dec 1904 at Macauley (GOHM?)
** The original record needs to be checked as Mary Ellen Peacock's 1935
death record gives Ellen's maiden name as Tubb(s).
013535-05 (Muskoka) George Nelson PEACOCK, 20,
laborer, Macauley Twp, same s/o John PEACOCK and
Mary Ellen OLIVER married Jesse FORSYTH, 20,
Macauley Twp, same d/o John FORSYTH and Mary
DALES, witness – George FORSYTH and Violet S.
PEACOCK, August 9, 1905, Bracebridge
18101-1919 Harvey Ray PEACOCK, 21, Labour, Scotia Jct.,
Bracebridge, s/o Robert Ray PEACOCK & Mary MOFFET,
married Robina CARSON, 20, Cache Bay, Same, d/o Thomas
CARSON & Agnes FLOOD, Wtn. George BOUTETTE, Loretta
McNALLY, on Dec. 24, 1919 at Sturgeon Falls
**Please note that other Peacock records, including John's
death certificate state that the family came from County Antrim,
not Derry.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
1853 TAX ASSESSMENT ROLLS - Toronto
Column 28 - “Statue Labour – Persons 21-60”
The book and CD version of the 1853 Tax Assessment for Toronto
provides the following information about Statute Labour.
“Prior to the development of a comprehensive system of property
taxes, repair work on bridges and roads was the responsibility of
the fronting property owners. This work was described as ‘statute
labour.’ As an alternative, the property owner could make a cash
payment in lieu of physical work. Overtime, cash payments
became the norm and the work was carried out by contract labour.
This column records the number of days each occupant was
assessed. Persons over sixty were exempt which was why the age
column was used.
“Column 24 was the taxable income of the person or proprietor.”
The first column in this assessment roll gives a number for each
property. Hugh Peacock is listed below a Mr. Horwood,
hotel keeper along with a number of other men. They all have a
different property number than the hotel, therefore the properties
were separate, and each of the men was required to do 10 days of
statute labour in lieu of property taxes. Column 24 provides
no taxable income for these men.
The book and CD version of the 1853 Tax Assessment for Toronto
provides the following information about Statute Labour.
“Prior to the development of a comprehensive system of property
taxes, repair work on bridges and roads was the responsibility of
the fronting property owners. This work was described as ‘statute
labour.’ As an alternative, the property owner could make a cash
payment in lieu of physical work. Overtime, cash payments
became the norm and the work was carried out by contract labour.
This column records the number of days each occupant was
assessed. Persons over sixty were exempt which was why the age
column was used.
“Column 24 was the taxable income of the person or proprietor.”
The first column in this assessment roll gives a number for each
property. Hugh Peacock is listed below a Mr. Horwood,
hotel keeper along with a number of other men. They all have a
different property number than the hotel, therefore the properties
were separate, and each of the men was required to do 10 days of
statute labour in lieu of property taxes. Column 24 provides
no taxable income for these men.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
